Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $74.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - $0.62 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6600 - 124 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
120
96.7741935483871%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
34.065934065934066%
Price, $
$225.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1286
79.77667493796527%
Multi-Core
3552
49.12183653713179%
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |