Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 471 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $63.5 vs $155.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 5 2600 - $0.47 vs $1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-7400T - 136 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
134
98.52941176470588%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349157 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
41.228070175438596%
Price, $
$155
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |