Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $63.5 vs $160.68
- Up to 48% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.48 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i5-7400T - 175 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
131
74.85714285714286%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349096 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
52.17391304347826%
Price, $
$160.68
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
46.31147540983606%
Multi-Core
2806
32.22694383829103%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |