Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - $63.5 vs $279.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 5900X - $0.54 vs $2.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-7400T - 130 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348973 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
25.116279069767444%
Price, $
$279
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348972 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
46.67278568150528%
Multi-Core
2806
23.613565597912984%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |