Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $63.5 vs $283.35
- Up to 76% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900KF - $0.54 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-7400T - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
93.60000000000001%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348968 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
23.78854625550661%
Price, $
$283.35
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348967 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
57.68576290414067%
Multi-Core
2806
30.65326633165829%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |