Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $63.5 vs $458.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-12900 - $0.32 vs $2.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Core i5-7400T - 220 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 24 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
196
89.0909090909091%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
15.384615384615385%
Price, $
$458
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
41.12414071977356%
Multi-Core
2806
21.511806194418888%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |