Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $63.5 vs $522.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900K - $0.32 vs $2.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Valheim than Core i5-7400T - 232 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 32 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
196
84.48275862068965%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349162 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.25/FPS
14.222222222222221%
Price, $
$522.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $522.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
34.19636852723605%
Multi-Core
2806
13.926940639269406%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |