Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3881 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $75.0 vs $150.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 173% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-750 - 60 vs 22 FPS
- Up to 27% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-750 - $2.5 vs $3.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 8 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
22
36.666666666666664%
Value, $/FPS
$3.41/FPS
73.31378299120234%
Price, $
$75
100%
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
60
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
50%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-750 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |