Buy on Amazon
$75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 3280 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $75.0 vs $99.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-9100T - $0.64 vs $0.77 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-750 - 129 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
117
90.69767441860465%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349388 minutes ago
Core i3-9100T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
83.11688311688312%
Price, $
$99
75%
FPS Winner
Intel Core I3 9100T I3-9100T 3.6GHz Quad-cores Four-Threaded 6M 65W LGA 1151 CPU Processor
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349389 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Core i3-9100T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
35.494596841230255%
Multi-Core
1200
37.75959723096287%
Intel Core i5-750 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
