Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 2361 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-760 - 111 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $70.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-760 - $0.63 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
98
88.28828828828829%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
61.76470588235294%
Price, $
$100
70%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358213 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
111
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
36.64795509222133%
Multi-Core
1280
52.459016393442624%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |