Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $100.0 vs $112.53
- Up to 5% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-10400F - $0.61 vs $0.64 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i5-760 - 175 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
163
93.14285714285714%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354254 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
95.3125%
Price, $
$112.53
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
31.780250347705145%
Multi-Core
1280
22.25699878282038%
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |