Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8120 - 187 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $78.02 vs $99.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7600 - $0.47 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
88.67924528301886%
Price, $
$99
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349931 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
167
89.3048128342246%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349930 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |