Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 and the cheaper Core i5-7400T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 12% better in Starfield than Core i5-7400T - 58 vs 52 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $63.5 vs $99.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-7600 - $1.22 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
71.34502923976608%
Price, $
$99
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349944 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
52
89.65517241379311%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349944 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
74.07137654770575%
Multi-Core
2806
73.6096537250787%
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |