Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1207 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 34% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $99.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.53 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7600 - 193 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
187
96.89119170984456%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349037 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
67.94871794871796%
Price, $
$150
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1373
82.21556886227545%
Multi-Core
3812
65.80355601588124%
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |