Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $63.5 vs $80.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Dead Island 2 than Ryzen 3 3200G - $0.46 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Island 2 than Core i5-7400T - 140 vs 138 FPS
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
138
98.57142857142858%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349518 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
80.70175438596492%
Price, $
$80
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
96.67300380228137%
Multi-Core
2806
93.12977099236642%
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |