Buy on Amazon
$140
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1985 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3450S - 131 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $95.0 vs $140.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-8400 - $0.79 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
73.83177570093457%
Price, $
$140
67%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-8400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349951 minutes ago
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
120
91.6030534351145%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3450S Quad-Core Processor 2.8 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450S
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-8400
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
43.163340724316335%
Multi-Core
1681
35.40438079191238%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450S |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
