Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1586 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than Core i5-4670S - 57 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - $55.26 vs $140.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-8400 - $1.02 vs $2.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
57
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
41.463414634146346%
Price, $
$140
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349821 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
54
94.73684210526315%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349821 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
85.07021433850703%
Multi-Core
3254
68.5341196293176%
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |