Buy on Amazon
$139
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 2164 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-3450S - 173 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $95.0 vs $139.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-8400T - $0.57 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-8400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
71.24999999999999%
Price, $
$139
68%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-8400T prcsr Tray
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361043 minutes ago
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
168
97.10982658959537%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3450S Quad-Core Processor 2.8 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450S
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-8400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
53.13921747042766%
Multi-Core
1681
43.280123583934085%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i5-3450S |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
