Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400T is 214 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-8400T - $109.99 vs $139.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-8400T - $0.6 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 16 vs 6 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
78.94736842105263%
Price, $
$139
79%
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359811 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
94.09246575342466%
Multi-Core
3884
67.03486365205384%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |