Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 180 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $112.0 vs $445.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.83 vs $3.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-9400F - 138 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 24 vs 6 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
135
97.82608695652173%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348505 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.22/FPS
25.77639751552795%
Price, $
$445
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $445 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
81.39397519196693%
Multi-Core
4834
48.64157778224995%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |