Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 81 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $112.0 vs $468.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900K - $0.6 vs $2.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9400F - 193 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
187
96.89119170984456%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348554 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
24.793388429752067%
Price, $
$468
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $468 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348554 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
82.61390887290167%
Multi-Core
4834
60.7286432160804%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |