Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4150 - 266 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $48.0 vs $112.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-9400F - $0.19 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
266
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
45.23809523809524%
Price, $
$112
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361304 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
255
95.86466165413535%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361304 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
75.54426705370102%
Multi-Core
2047
42.345883326437736%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |