Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1358 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $112.0 vs $593.77
- Up to 78% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13600KF - $0.6 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9400F - 217 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
187
86.17511520737328%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348556 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
21.8978102189781%
Price, $
$593.77
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348555 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
50.16381507098653%
Multi-Core
4834
31.359065844956213%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 14 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |