Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11400F - 167 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $113.0 vs $593.77
- Up to 81% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13600KF - $0.69 vs $3.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.56/FPS
19%
Price, $
$593.77
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286738 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286739 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |