Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600K is 559 days older than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-10700F - 62 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $170.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 30% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-10700F - $2.74 vs $3.9 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$170
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $170 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
58
93.54838709677419%
Value, $/FPS
$3.9/FPS
70.25641025641026%
Price, $
$225.99
75%
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |