Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3357 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-2100 - 180 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $49.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-10700F - $0.32 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
25.396825396825395%
Price, $
$225.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361742 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
151
83.88888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
28.90818858560794%
Multi-Core
954
13.193195961831005%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |