Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 33% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-10700F - 77 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $160.68 vs $225.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-10700F - $2.09 vs $3.9 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
58
75.32467532467533%
Value, $/FPS
$3.9/FPS
53.58974358974359%
Price, $
$225.99
71%
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348549 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348548 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
73.40619307832422%
Multi-Core
7231
83.04812220052831%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |