Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-2405S - 166 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $46.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-10700F - $0.32 vs $1.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
166
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
23.52941176470588%
Price, $
$225.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361889 minutes ago
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
145
87.34939759036145%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361888 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
33.188585607940446%
Multi-Core
1429
19.762135251002626%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-2405S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | No |