Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4690 - 180 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $52.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-10700F - $0.31 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
24.6031746031746%
Price, $
$225.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361739 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
169
93.88888888888889%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
73.8833746898263%
Multi-Core
3303
45.67832941501867%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |