Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 185 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $225.99 vs $535.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9900KS - $1.82 vs $4.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 65 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-10700F - 126 vs 124 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
98.4126984126984%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.25/FPS
42.8235294117647%
Price, $
$535
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
90.56179775280899%
Multi-Core
7231
84.12052117263843%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 127 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |