Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $225.99 vs $593.77
- Up to 38% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-13600KF - $3.9 vs $6.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 64% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-10700F - 95 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
58
61.05263157894737%
Value, $/FPS
$3.9/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348902 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.25/FPS
62.4%
Price, $
$593.77
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
58.682198762286134%
Multi-Core
7231
46.90885501135258%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |