Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-4130 - 172 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $43.0 vs $247.71
- Up to 81% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-10700K - $0.27 vs $1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
18.750000000000004%
Price, $
$247.71
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $247.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
161
93.6046511627907%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
58.32356389214537%
Multi-Core
1960
24.07270940800786%
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |