Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K and the cheaper Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i9-10900F - 209 vs 207 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $244.77 vs $247.71
- Up to 1% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-10700K - $1.18 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
99%
Price, $
$247.71
98%
FPS Winner
Buy for $247.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280295 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |