Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 101% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-540 - 461 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $90.0 vs $202.98
- Up to 11% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-11700F - $0.39 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
461
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
88.63636363636364%
Price, $
$202.98
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $202.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361169 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
229
49.67462039045553%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |