Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $70.0 vs $99.03
- Up to 13% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i3-10100 - $0.47 vs $0.54 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 23% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-2600K - 182 vs 148 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
148
81.31868131868131%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349818 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
87.03703703703702%
Price, $
$99.03
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349819 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
46.84431977559607%
Multi-Core
2320
55.04151838671412%
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |