Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2369 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $82.0 vs $155.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 5 2600 - $1.74 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Core i7-2700K - 54 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
47
87.03703703703704%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349455 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
60.62717770034843%
Price, $
$155
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349457 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
57.638888888888886%
Multi-Core
2264
46.76719686015286%
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |