Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4090 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $82.0 vs $147.99
- Up to 16% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-13100 - $1.74 vs $2.06 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 53% better in Starfield than Core i7-2700K - 72 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 60 vs 95 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
47
65.27777777777779%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349457 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.06/FPS
84.46601941747572%
Price, $
$147.99
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349457 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
29.471815357301377%
Multi-Core
2264
30.857298623415563%
Intel Core i7-2700K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |