Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i7-3632QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3364 days newer than Core i7-3632QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3632QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-3632QM - 166 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3632QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Oct 19th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3632QM | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |