Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $80.0 vs $160.68
- Up to 19% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-11600KF - $0.57 vs $0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 65% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3770 - 231 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
140
60.60606060606061%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
81.42857142857143%
Price, $
$160.68
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
30.555555555555557%
Multi-Core
2299
26.40404272424486%
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |