Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-6350 - 159 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $100.0 vs $160.68
- Up to 20% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-11600KF - $0.81 vs $1.01 per FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
80.19801980198021%
Price, $
$160.68
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
123
77.35849056603774%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |