Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2729 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $80.0 vs $615.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900X - $0.71 vs $5.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 77 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3770 - 123 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
113
91.869918699187%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348904 minutes ago
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
42.576142131979694%
Multi-Core
2299
24.533134137231887%
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |