Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $80.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10900K - $2.67 vs $7.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 110% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-3770 - 63 vs 30 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
30
47.61904761904761%
Value, $/FPS
$2.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.78/FPS
34.318766066838045%
Price, $
$490
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
38.36477987421384%
Multi-Core
2299
25.090036014405765%
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |