Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2005 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Core i7-3820 - 171 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $270.0 vs $319.88
- Up to 19% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-3820 - $1.58 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 24 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
164
95.90643274853801%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
81.02564102564102%
Price, $
$319.88
84%
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358106 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
52.55536626916525%
Multi-Core
2299
32.955848623853214%
Intel Core i7-3820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |