Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3410 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-3960X - 265 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $160.68 vs $274.85
- Up to 52% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i7-3960X - $0.61 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 125 vs 130 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
216
81.50943396226415%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
48.031496062992126%
Price, $
$274.85
58%
Buy for $274.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358249 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
265
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Single-Core
690
31.420765027322407%
Multi-Core
3358
38.56667049500402%
Intel Core i7-3960X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |