Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2737 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 52% better in FIFA 23 than Core i7-3970X - 163 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-3970X - $112.53 vs $209.74
- Up to 65% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-3970X - $0.69 vs $1.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-3970X - 65 vs 150 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
FPS
107
65.6441717791411%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
35.204081632653065%
Price, $
$209.74
53%
Buy for $209.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359836 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359837 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2012
Single-Core
648
45.06258692628651%
Multi-Core
3305
57.46826638845418%
Intel Core i7-3970X | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |