Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 399 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770S - 162 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $75.0 vs $498.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4765T - $0.48 vs $3.08 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
15.584415584415584%
Price, $
$498.95
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363029 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
156
96.29629629629629%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 363028 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
73.35526315789474%
Multi-Core
2234
76.74338715218138%
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |