Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $75.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - $0.44 vs $2.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770S - 194 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 20 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
172
88.65979381443299%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349034 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
17.39130434782609%
Price, $
$490
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
38.25042881646655%
Multi-Core
2234
24.380661355451274%
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |