Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-4771 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-4771 is 1439 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4771
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $103.73 vs $270.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.89 vs $4.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4771 - 24 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $103.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349808 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.91/FPS
38.49287169042769%
Price, $
$270
38%
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349808 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
98.40737636211232%
Multi-Core
6976
100%
Intel Core i7-4771 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |