Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3412 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4820K - 148 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-4820K - $147.99 vs $199.88
- Up to 41% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4820K - $1.0 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 60 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
118
79.72972972972973%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
59.171597633136095%
Price, $
$199.88
74%
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358250 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
148
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$147.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
29.20550377274745%
Multi-Core
2440
33.25609922311571%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 60 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |