Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4820K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $199.88 vs $244.77
- Up to 12% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-10900F - $1.21 vs $1.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in God of War than Core i7-4820K - 178 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 20 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
165
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280933 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
87%
Price, $
$244.77
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280934 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |